Modifying the Framework, Amd. I

In response to a criticism by e-mail, the framework ought to be revised. In brief, the concept of "neutral among belief systems" is specious and vague both normatively and positively. But primarily it is just redundant.

Furthermore, on reflection I think that these vague outlines in this Framework get to the heart of the "values" and objectives of Modern American Liberals (MALs) but do not induce serious disagreements from all Modern American Conservatives (MACs). Rather, on at least some counts, MACs will disagree with the methodological wisdom and efficacy of how the MALs may choose to implement these goals, even if the goals themselves are not disputed. But that is not the case for all matters -- particularly the social safety net (I.c.) which MACs typically reject as conflicting with Individual autonomy (I.a.) because the taxation and redistribution necessary to achieve the safety net must reduce individual autonomy and freedom of action.

New Framework:

ModAmLiberalism
I. Human dignity and autonomy
a. All human beings of any color, creed, lifestyle, etc. are
ultimately "ends" in any system of governance.
b. Fairness of opportunity is more important than "leveling" or pure equality.
c. Safety Net (a bare minimum of food, healthcare, education and housing for everyone, most especially for children)

II. Open Society / Govt. Rationality
a. Government must justify coercion with rational, fallible explanations / justifications that are non-sectarian.
b. Transparency of "public" actions (by Government or large
corporations that may as well be part of the "system" of governance
due to their power, authority, and favored status)

III. Scientific Rationalism
a. The idea that science's assumption of fallibility comports more
with the above goals than sectarian government does. An assumption of privileging claims that can be falsified over claims that cannot (most religious claims) in terms of explaining government policies.
b. Self-analysis, self-criticism, metacognition as being necessary for
a working and accountable system of Democratic self-government. Hence a commitment to a very high level of freedom of speech and association, and of course THOUGHT.

* We have to ask now, if the social safety net concept (I.c.) is not more of a policy implementing equality of opportunity than it is a fundamental commitment.